Jump to content
Why are we here ..... ×
  • 0

Account Handlers


RyanH

Question

Good Morning

 

First post on the forum.

 

I moved to a broker in the summer that is on OGi. My last use of anything resembling it was with Misys at the broker I left in 1998. Some time then! All systems that I have used since then have had the capability to note the exec at client level and then both the exec and the handler at policy level. Therefore, for example, if a client has six policies due for renewal on the same day, 5 commercial and one personal lines, the renewal lists generated for the exec would show the commercial handler against the 5 and the personal lines handler against the 1. Equally, renewal lists could be generated by handler as well as exec. The system we have in operation doesn't have this and I am told internally that it is not possible.

 

Whilst not doubting what has been advised to the individuals concerned, I remain surprised that this is not an option when most (or at least a good number of) other systems provide this. Does anybody have any experience of what it is I am looking for or indeed advice as to how this might be added to our existing platform? Any thoughts would be appreciated.

 

Many thanks

Link to comment

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

you could try a database enquiry to generate a report

 

if you have a handler for the client then the exec on the level 1 (bcm) would be e.g. JS (john smith) and the level 2 (bpy) exec would be any other handlers for personal and commercial

 

bcm.exec  eq  JS

bpy.rdat   from  xx/xx/xxxx

bpy.rdat   to   xx/xx/xxxx

 

then you can generate a list for that handlers clients for the set date range.

 

Not quite as simple as a report but it might give you the results you want

 

Hope this helps.

 

Steve Wyatt

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • "Exciting news for Brokers!" ???     #nope Critical mass Target customer size and profile On line only #whataboutthemasses   What do you think??
    • Hi Claire,   We took on INVU back in 2008 and still use it today in its Virtual Cabinet guise. No issues with printing from VC whether that be to network printers or pdf and there are also options to send from VC to email which can be useful.    Overall, we remain very happy with VC so have seen no real advantage to move over to OpenAttach.   One little issue is we never managed to get the automatic indexing / filing of standard OGI/OpenWord letters and emails into VC. We just click a few buttons to file them manually.   Happy to chat through further if you wish - I will be at the Members day this coming Thursday    Darren
    • Hi @Clare Carter   I probably cant advise on day to day use / issues, but may be able to help although not sure of your question   Are you still on Virtual Cabinet (VC) and how are you trying to print on OGI - and what / where from   Also - I'm pretty sure there are minimal issues with transferring to OpenAttach - what are the concerns there?  
    • Just wondering if any of the current members have previously been using Virtual Cabinet, and which originally was Invu provided by Linden House.   It is only relatively recently that Open GI have come up with Open Attach but there is an issue in transferring data.   If anyone is still using Virtual Cabinet which evolved from Invu and Linden House, could they let me know whether they had any issues with Open GI and printing.    Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...