Jump to content
Why are we here ..... ×
  • 0

Auto update Level 1 Address detail


DarrenKelly

Question

Hi,

 

Does anyone know if there is an option to prevent the EDI system auto updating the Client Master Level 1 address details to the correspondence address within the EDI policy at renewal?

 

We have some historic EDI cases on the same Client master and want to retain the mailing address we have physically entered in BROOMS.

 

Thanks,

Darren

Link to comment

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Hi Darren 

 

There is a setting in BrokerLink to control how you update the Client record detail following an MTA - not sure on Rnls though ....:huh:

 

Check the On-Line-Guides link here and look for "Update Level 1 at MTA" - I believe it's a "global" setting - so all or nothing I'm afraid .....

 

Don't use EDI in anger generally - so happy to be corrected - but the above may give you some inspiration / options :rolleyes: 

 

Hope this helps!

Link to comment
  • 0

Thanks Mark,

 

I had previously looked in BrokerLink control and it already had the ' update Level 1 at MTA' flagged 'No'.

 

I'm wondering if it could be linked to APM? - that said, I can't see anything in the 124 options within Prospect Control that may be the culprit.:( Plus it's hard to replicate in a test environment without mucking up live EDI cases.

 

It's not a mega urgent issue, so I'll see if anyone else on the forum can point me in the right direction before logging a support request.

 

Have a good day:D

 

 

Link to comment
  • 0

Hi Darren - yes - it's all a bit cloudy re the EDI Renewals processing. Some would even say it's an outrage to update "your" client data which is nothing to do with the EDI record.

 

I'm pretty sure there will be an option somewhere - Get it logged anyway for reference - and hopefully meanwhile see if anyone else here can offer practical advice from the actual EDI userbase.

 

Would be good to share the options if there are any :)

 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • "Exciting news for Brokers!" ???     #nope Critical mass Target customer size and profile On line only #whataboutthemasses   What do you think??
    • Hi Claire,   We took on INVU back in 2008 and still use it today in its Virtual Cabinet guise. No issues with printing from VC whether that be to network printers or pdf and there are also options to send from VC to email which can be useful.    Overall, we remain very happy with VC so have seen no real advantage to move over to OpenAttach.   One little issue is we never managed to get the automatic indexing / filing of standard OGI/OpenWord letters and emails into VC. We just click a few buttons to file them manually.   Happy to chat through further if you wish - I will be at the Members day this coming Thursday    Darren
    • Hi @Clare Carter   I probably cant advise on day to day use / issues, but may be able to help although not sure of your question   Are you still on Virtual Cabinet (VC) and how are you trying to print on OGI - and what / where from   Also - I'm pretty sure there are minimal issues with transferring to OpenAttach - what are the concerns there?  
    • Just wondering if any of the current members have previously been using Virtual Cabinet, and which originally was Invu provided by Linden House.   It is only relatively recently that Open GI have come up with Open Attach but there is an issue in transferring data.   If anyone is still using Virtual Cabinet which evolved from Invu and Linden House, could they let me know whether they had any issues with Open GI and printing.    Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...