Jump to content
  • 0

Details of the Escrow Agreement


diarmuid

Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Hi Diarmuid

 

The Escrow is owned by Open GI - the User Group have exclusive access / beneficiaries should an event occur. If you need a copy of the current document, you will probably need to go via your Account Manager. Meanwhile, I'll ask the User Group Committee to raise with OGI at the next meeting to confirm correct approach and contact points if Members require open access to the document - it shouldn't be a secret :)

 

Link to comment
  • 0
On 10/12/2019 at 10:17, Mark Sollis said:

Hi Diarmuid

 

The Escrow is owned by Open GI - the User Group have exclusive access / beneficiaries should an event occur. If you need a copy of the current document, you will probably need to go via your Account Manager. Meanwhile, I'll ask the User Group Committee to raise with OGI at the next meeting to confirm correct approach and contact points if Members require open access to the document - it shouldn't be a secret :)

 

Is there any further feedback on this please. I am trying to obtain further details of the Escrow Agreement for my director and have sent a request to the User Group via the website over a month ago but not had any response.

Thanks

Clare

Link to comment
  • 0

Hi Clare

 

Sorry if your original message went unanswered - I'll try and track down what happened to that!

 

Meanwhile FYI - OGI confirmed that they had responded to Diarmuid and provided detail on the Escrow and how it would be activated. As the Escrow document is held by OGI until such an event occurs, then anyone requiring further info should enquire via their Account Manager in the same way. 

 

I am aware that the User Group will be publishing some headline info for reference only - but ultimately the source will be Open GI for the full and best answers on this

 

Hope this helps

Link to comment
  • 0

Hi Clare

To follow up on this. I only got an overview from OpenI. I was informed that the full details are confidential, as the agreement is between the user group and OpenI. 
That sufficed for the auditors this time. But I will likely get asked the same question again, and I don’t have the detail. 
 

Regards 

Link to comment
  • 0

Well that seems strange!!!

 

whats the point of having an agreement between parties if those parties are not entitled to know what the agreement is 🧐

 

I’ll make sure we clarify at the April meeting. 

 

Meanwhile, it would be good to know “what” information will be acceptable to the auditors. They are the ones asking the questions - so what are the questions they want answered? Then we can put those to OGI for their response. 
 

#lefthandrighthand

Link to comment
  • 0
16 hours ago, Mark Sollis said:

Hi Clare

 

Sorry if your original message went unanswered - I'll try and track down what happened to that!

 

Meanwhile FYI - OGI confirmed that they had responded to Diarmuid and provided detail on the Escrow and how it would be activated. As the Escrow document is held by OGI until such an event occurs, then anyone requiring further info should enquire via their Account Manager in the same way. 

 

I am aware that the User Group will be publishing some headline info for reference only - but ultimately the source will be Open GI for the full and best answers on this

 

Hope this helps

Thank you Mark & Diarmuid, I will contact our Open GI Account Manager and see what response I get..

 

Clare

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • So #BIBA for Real is back! Anyone else going?    Handy Tip - "Speak to more people you don't know, than those you do know"   You can thank me later - with flowers 🌻 💖
    • "Warning re Sanctions Checks on #OpenGI"   This post is now available in the Public area of the Forum for review and comment 
    • Great to meet back up with the Open GI User Group Committee after soooooo many sessions on remote links   Breaking bread face to face is much more pleasant than a cup-of-soup in between video chats    Exciting times ahead for members and lot's of new stuff coming from Open GI
    • So - what is the point of this ..   Don't tell me even if you say "Yes" - it's actually being ignored?   Why would anyone restrict Sanctions Checks to specific Client / types - let alone specific Capture Page Layouts - SURELY a Yes/No per Client / Contact - and the existing global parameters - covers all the bases. Oh and where in the manual did it not explain this?   Either way - the Yes/No below is at best misleading for operators and at worst - a breach for the business!! Who's picking up that cost ...  
    • So, we find ourselves in modern day unprecedented time.  Governments around the world are applying strict sanctions against Russian companies and individuals and it's being made very clear that action will be taken if those sactions are ignored.   For most of us, this will not be an issue but what if you do have a sanctioned individual or company?  Are you checking?  Are you relying on Open GI Sanctions checking?   First of all, have you got Broker and Prospect Amendment completed under sanctions checking to review Commercial Risks?  Using the Level 1 Contacts on a Commercial master frame will also Sanction check whoever or whatever you put in for review.     However, what about your personal lines clients?  The client level is checked sure, but what about the contacts you've added??  Well, if you're not aware, be aware.  They don't get checked.  So, if you've corrected added a contact for a joint policyholder on a Home policy for example, just hope you've either got them insured in their own right somewhere or that they are not called Abramovich!     The point of Sanctions checking is that you have a record of the checks, in the event of something being highlighted.  Open GI have gone to the trouble of making this work for the Commercial risks but not Personal Lines.   However, your User Group Committee have raised this issue and will continue to apply pressure until something is done.
×
×
  • Create New...